More From Clicks
The mirror — our page, our rubric, published

More From Clicks, scored by More From Clicks

morefromclicks.com · re-run 27 July 2026 against rubric v2 · measured with Google PageSpeed Insights, the same public tool you can run on us yourself

6.5/10
Our own score
99
Mobile speed /100
1.5s
Main content loaded
25 KB
Page weight
0/10
Call readiness
Our score just went down, and we're publishing that too. The old version of this page said 8.2/10. Then we rebuilt our rubric to include Google's own UX Playbook for Landing Pages — adding value proposition, call-to-action quality, single-goal focus and social proof as scored dimensions. Re-scored against the tougher standard, we dropped to 6.5. A rubric that never catches its owner isn't a rubric, so here it is.

Every dimension, including the ones we fail

DimensionWeightScore
Mobile speed20%10
Call readiness20%0
Value proposition (Google)15%9
CTA quality (Google)15%7
Keyword→page match10%7
Single goal (Google)10%9
Social proof (Google)5%2
Form quality5%8

What it found

OPEN — named honestly

1 · No phone number anywhere on this page

We score ourselves zero out of ten on the dimension we weight at twenty percent — and we tell plumbing companies that a missing or untappable number is the most expensive leak there is. On purpose, for now: our 24/7 answered line launches with the same product we prescribe to clients, and we won't print a number until it answers around the clock. Until then this finding stands against us, and it costs us more of our score than anything else on the page.

OPEN — named honestly

2 · Almost no social proof

No star ratings, no review schema, no testimonials, one dated founder case. Google's framework is blunt about this — most buyers want to see that other people trusted you first. We can't fix it with copywriting; it's fixed by earning client results and publishing them with their baselines. Until then: 2/10, openly.

OPEN

3 · No sticky call-to-action for scrollers

Someone reading to the bottom has to scroll back up or find the closing button. A persistent action bar is a standard fix and it's on our own list.

What passed

99/100 on mobile, 1.5s to main content, 25KB total — faster than almost every page we audit, which average 50–80× heavier. One H1, one job, one primary button — no carousel, no popup, no interstitial, and two navigation links instead of the eighty-five we found on a plumbing page this week. The button says "Send me my free teardown", not "Submit" — the exact distinction Google measures a 33% lift on. Price published, agenda published, no-chase promise stated.

This is the audit we run on ourselves, with the failures left in. The one we run on your page is free, and every finding is priced in dollars.

Get your free teardown

Method: identical to every teardown we produce — Google PageSpeed Insights (mobile), full page-source scan, and scoring across eight dimensions, four of which come directly from Google's UX Playbook for Landing Pages. Findings listed exactly as found, including the ones that cost us points. This page is re-run whenever the site changes; if the score moves, this page moves with it.

Prepared by More From Clicks · on ourselves · 27 July 2026 · see a client-style teardown →